2. The fact that the defendant confessions the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant, or in light of the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant, the crime of this case is not very good, the victims wanted to punish the defendant, and the victim J and M want not recover any particular damage. The defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he was under the suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, etc., the fact that the defendant again committed the crime of this case is disadvantageous to the defendant. In addition, the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court, and the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee of the Sentencing Committee, and other circumstances that the court below is judged to have exceeded the reasonable limit of the discretion of sentencing decision, and the defendant's new evidence was not presented during the sentencing hearing process of the court of the first instance (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.