When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 3, 2018, at around 03:10, the Defendant: (a) went to the vicinity of the Defendant’s house by getting on a taxi under the influence of alcohol and arrived at the vicinity of the Defendant’s house; and (b) the Defendant, upon receiving a report from the foregoing taxi engineer, recommended that he/she pay a taxi fee and voluntarily return to the taxi from the police officer belonging to the Yongsan-dong Police Station B District, which was called out after receiving the report from the above taxi engineer, and paid the taxi fee, and the Defendant attempted to leave the taxi site by moving the patrol lane.

At around 03:10 on November 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) laid the front window of the patrol car to leave the scene without any justifiable reason, on the roads near the Heung-gu D, Young-si; (b) opened the windows by the patrol vehicle, and collected the owner’s body while holding the windows, and (c) assaulted, such as plucking and plucking the breath of the said C, so that the patrol car does not depart.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a caps of a caps;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects the mistake while making a confession of the crime in this case, the degree of violence by the defendant is not much serious, the criminal records and fines do not have any record of crime exceeding the same kind of criminal records and fines, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances