If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 20:00 on July 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sought to agree on the case of interference with business in the beauty room operated by the victim D, and (b) sought to agree on the case of interference with business in the beauty room operated by the victim; (c) however, while the victim did not prepare a written agreement, and (d) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant took the form of the written agreement cited by the victim in the hand, “I am, I am, I am am sat, I am am sat, and I am am on the floor of the beauty room, and am satis.

The Defendant interfered with the legitimate beauty room business of the victim for about 25 minutes by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by taking account of the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, such as the Defendant’s confession and reflection of all of the instant cases; and (b) relatively old health is not good.