2. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is Seoul.

A. The Plaintiff purchased Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government large 96.2 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 28, 2006.

B. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 9, 1989, on the ground of sale on November 10, 1989, with respect to the housing of 16.5 square meters in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and 0.7 square meters in E, and the two-storys in each of the above lands (hereinafter “instant building”).

C. Of the instant building, part of the second floor is protruding more than the first floor and is in a state of breaking up the part of 3.3 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “the part in possession of this case”) connected with each point of 8,9,10,11,6, and 8 of the attached drawing among the instant land in sequence.

(2) Each appraisal of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul's evidence Nos. 1 and 5 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and video, appraiser F, and G, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. As to the plaintiff's assertion of the parties concerned seeking removal of the building part of this case and delivery of the possessed part of this case as the principal lawsuit, the defendant's dismissal of the plaintiff's principal lawsuit and implementation of the registration procedure for transfer of ownership as to the occupied part of this case as a counterclaim on the ground that the acquisition by prescription has been completed with respect to

3. We also examine the principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

A. In the event that the purchaser’s purchase and possession of the site were commenced by acquiring the site along with the ground building, it is believed that part of the adjoining land belongs to the site he/she acquired by the purchaser, and that it actually occupies a part of the adjoining land, barring any special circumstance, the possession of the adjoining land is also deemed as autonomous possession with the intention of ownership, barring any special circumstance.

Supreme Court Decision 9Da586 delivered on June 25, 1999