However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 5, 2019, at around 21:31, 2019, the Defendant reported that C had a verbal dispute with his wife in front of the Dongducheon-si Bel, and that C had a her wife aboard the vehicle, and that C had a her to drink on the vehicle, and the circumstances leading up to the police box belonging to the Dongducheon-gu Police Station D police box called the scene, E, and the slope F, who attempted to take a large volume of the defect C to take a walk from the vehicle, and attempted to take the above police officer's walked.

Accordingly, while the Defendant took a bath to the above police officers and took a spawn, the Defendant was unable to cope with the above F’s request for support by two police officers, and the police officers assigned to the same police box called to the site at the same time after receiving the above F’s request for support by G was spawn and spawn with the Defendant’s spawn and spawn’s chest part of the chest.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Reports on internal investigation (on-site conditions, etc.) and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on 112 reported case processing lists, copies of work logs, CCTV screen images-fix photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One month to five years;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] the obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1]/ the obstruction of performance of official duties [the scope of recommendations and recommendations] no person shall be subject to the coercion of official duties [the scope of recommendations and recommendations]. The basic area of recommendation, six months to one year and six months.

3. Although there is a record of punishment for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. around 2007, the Defendant has committed the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties.

However, considering the fact that the defendant shows an attitude against the defendant, there is a family member to support.