2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The plaintiff is a clan comprised of descendants of F, E-C, 30 descendants, and completed the registration of a clan on July 4, 1991.

On the other hand, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO are children of the net F (C).

B. At the time of the division, P Forest land 8,430 square meters (hereinafter “the forest before the division”) was completed in the name of the Defendant’s father, but the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on the forest before the division on October 6, 1997 due to donation made on September 3, 1997.

C. Around January 21, 1990, H, K, L, and I drafted a written agreement with regard to the forest land before the instant partition (hereinafter “instant agreement”). D.

Before the instant partition, the forest land was divided into C and D forests after registration conversion into 8,340 square meters of C forest land before the partition on April 7, 2004.

[Ground of recognition] The descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Plaintiff’s assertion and judgment

A. (1) The plaintiff asserts to the following purport:

On July 5, 1965, the children of the networkF collected the purchase fund and purchased the forest land before the instant partition. However, the title of ownership was the name of H, the souther.

As G, the mother of H et al. died on January 17, 1990, H had to transfer part of the forest land before the instant partition to the Plaintiff established around that time, as agreed in the instant agreement, taking into account the ownership of purchase price-sharing relationship. This is the part of the instant (a) and (b).

As above, the Plaintiff and H had a title trust agreement with respect to the portion of the instant paragraphs (a) and (b). The Defendant donated the forest land before the instant division from H, and succeeded to the status of H’s title trustee.

In addition, the Defendant concluded a title trust agreement with the Plaintiff regarding the portion of the instant (a) and (b) in the process of receiving survey costs to divide the forest before the instant partition from the Plaintiff.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim and purport of the instant case.