게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won in penalty) is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The defendant's liability for crimes in light of his/her role as a person in charge of money exchange affairs for the game of the defendant;
In addition to the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that it cannot be seen that there is a disadvantage against the defendant, but on the other hand, there is no change of circumstances that could add the punishment of the court below in the trial, considering the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, method and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.
The prosecutor's improper argument in sentencing is without merit.
3. As the prosecutor’s appeal of conclusion is without merit, it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the application of the law of the judgment below ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure shall be deleted “(Defendant I)” as stated in the detention part of the workhouse.