When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a public official belonging to the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education who serves as a C elementary school administrative office in the Dong Office of Education.

1. Around D 11:25, the Defendant posted a letter, “E” on the Ara square bulletin board and “E,” “The principal of the school,” “as the head of the administrative office who intends to come in the school room that occurs in the place of the school in dispute with other teachers, such as the assistant principal and the head of the information department, shall go to the head of the administrative office who is going to go in the school room in the place of the school, and again, the head of the administrative office who takes place in the place of the school, has carried a quih to a hing and hacking a shoulder and hacking a hing with the head of the administrative office that takes place in the place of the school,” thereby impairing the reputation of F through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering

2. At around G 13:09, the Defendant: (a) called “H” and “H” on the bulletin board of the Square, and (b) the principal forced the Department I of six-year Department I of six-year Department I to be selected as the J photographic Official at the time of the selection of the principal; and (c) the first part of the K Computer Enterprise’s selection agreement entered into in the school room is unfair and invalid as an illegal contract.

In the title of "", the F principal forced a contract with an enterprise that does not comply with the terms and conditions of the contract, and exercised unfair pressure, such as why he or she becomes aware of the contract with the enterprise that does not submit the contract documents, and why he or she has other duties.

“.......”

However, in fact, F did not force a certain entity to select a certain entity in order to select a photographer and K computer company, or did not exercise undue pressure.

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering a person, the Defendant damaged F's reputation by exposing a false fact openly through information and communication network.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the witness F in the eight-time public trial records;

1. Each police statement with respect to F, I, or L;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the data to be caught, the text of judgment, and the written decision not to prosecute;

1. Criminal facts;