2. In light of the fact that the Defendant was punished for larceny several times, and that the Defendant constitutes a repeated offense, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant. However, it is relatively minor that the damage of the instant crime is a total of 628,500 won, and the Defendant recovered the damage by paying the above clothes to the victim after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s current operation of luminous cancer is not sufficient to health, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the argument of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, etc., it cannot be said that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.