The film production cost of KRW 300 million was loaned, and the film is completed and repaid six months later.

However, in fact, approximately KRW 3 billion is required for the production of motion pictures, while the account of the defendant company at the time was not only KRW 1.4 billion, the net loss of the company was about KRW 277 million, the defendant's obligation was about KRW 400 million, and there was no other investment undertaking in connection with the production of motion pictures. Therefore, even if the defendant borrowed KRW 300 million from the defendant, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was issued KRW 300 million on the same day by the victim.

Judgment

In full view of the following facts and circumstances revealed by the evidence adopted and examined by the court, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① At the time of lending KRW 300 million to the Defendant, C was aware that the Defendant’s credit standing and the financial status of E Co., Ltd. operated by the Defendant was not good (C did not make an investment in the investigative agency and this court on the premise that “the Defendant requested investment in film production because the financial situation is difficult, but was dangerous.”

However, the defendant extended money to the defendant because it is difficult to find several times, and the defendant received repayment six months later, and lent KRW 300 million.

It stated to the effect that young people were free of interest in the manner that young people want to grow.

Therefore, C was accused of the Defendant’s credit and financial status at the time of lending money to the Defendant.

see.