(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Judgment based on the recommendation of confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The Plaintiff’s determination as to the legitimacy of the lawsuit against the Defendant New Card Co., Ltd. and the Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Succession to the National D’s Compensation Fund is seeking confirmation as to the Plaintiff’s right to claim payment of KRW 25 million out of KRW 27,241,90 deposited by Seoul Northern District Court Decision 920 on March 29, 2012, for the same reasons as indicated in the grounds of the attached Form. < Amended by Act No. 11374, Mar. 29, 2012>

However, according to the evidence No. 3, and even according to the plaintiff's assertion itself, the new card company and the defendant's succeeding intervenor's national happiness fund, which are the defendant's new card company and the defendant's succeeding intervenor's above defendant's above defendant's aforementioned defendant's succeeding intervenor's right to claim payment of deposit money. It is not necessary for the judgment in favor of the plaintiff's new card company and the defendant's succeeding intervenor's succeeding intervenor's right to claim payment of deposit money against the defendant's new card company and the defendant's succeeding intervenor's succeeding intervenor's right to claim payment of deposit money. Further, since the plaintiff's new card company and the defendant's succeeding intervenor's succeeding intervenor's right to claim payment of deposit money does not dispute the plaintiff's assertion,

3. Thus, the plaintiff's new card company and the defendant's succeeding intervenor's succeeding intervenor's lawsuit against the National Uniform Fund, which is unlawful, is dismissed. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant B and C is justified.