beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.02.13 2018고정787

사문서위조등

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On October 20, 2016, the summary of the facts charged by the Defendant at the “C Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around October 20, 2016, the Defendant entered the lessor’s address in the lessor’s address “Seomun-gu E”, “10,000,000” in the location of the real estate in the deposit column, “80,000” in the rent column, “80,000” in the delivery period, “ By October 20, 2016,” “F apartment G,” “H” in the lessor’s resident registration number column, and “I” in the lessor’s name and “I”, and put a prior seal on the lessor’s name and later placed in the lessor’s address.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of I, a private document on rights and obligations.

On February 20, 2018, at the same place as Paragraph 1., the Defendant, at the same time as the above I, requested K’s staff member who purchased a building with C Licensed Real Estate Agent Office from the above I to transfer the above real estate office to the Defendant, presented the above real estate lease contract which was forged and kept as above.

Accordingly, the Defendant presented to K a forged real estate lease contract as if it were a document that was duly formed.

2. The Defendant’s assertion by the parties requires a lease contract made in the name of a licensed real estate agent in the name of the licensed real estate agent when jointly operating a licensed real estate agent and a brokerage office without qualification as a licensed real estate agent, and reporting to the competent Gu/Si/Gun office. As such, I explained such circumstances to I, and I received seals from I whenever a partner changes his/her name while keeping them, I prepared a lease contract made in the name of a licensed real estate agent, and the lessee is not arbitrarily forged.