However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant, who is a national of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, had a mind to conclude a marriage report with the intention to enter the Republic of Korea without the intention to maintain a matrimonial relationship with C, a male of the Republic of Korea, and to find a job.

On June 16, 2008, the defendant submitted to the public official in charge of family register a marriage report prepared by C with the defendant and other documents necessary for marriage in the Seongbuk-gu public service center of the Seongbuk-gu Office in Daejeon-si, Daejeon-si.

In the end, the Defendant conspired with C to have a public official in charge of family register record false facts in a public electronic record book, and around that time, the Defendant exercised this by having a public electronic record file, which recorded false facts, stored the family register electronic data processing system.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a copy of marriage relation certificate and marriage report;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 228 (1), 30 ( point of false entry, such as public electronic records, etc. and choice of imprisonment), 229, 228 (1), and 30 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts; and choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, including the confession and reflect that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment after entry