The Defendant deposited the money acquired by the organization of Bosing (Tesing Financial Fraud) from the victim to the Defendant’s account, and then the Defendant directly withdrawn the money from the bank counter and solicited the Defendant to receive the fee for Bosing and fee from the Defendant.

On March 4, 2015, in accordance with the above public offering, the personnel in charge of singinging the name in secret call to the victim D at a non-place on March 4, 2015, saying, “The Seoul Central Inquiry Agency is an investigator of the high-tech crime in Seoul Central Inquiry Agency, and the party's account was involved in the crime, so cooperation in the investigation would have been avoided, and thus, the personnel in charge of singing the money will return the money to the virtual account of A of the personnel in charge of sing down the money from the passbook.”

However, in fact, it was not the Seoul Central District Prosecutor, and there was no fact that the account of the victim was involved in the crime, and it was thought that it was used in the Bophishing fraud by receiving money from the victim.

Nevertheless, as seen above, the employee under the name of the defendant was accused of the victim, and then transferred KRW 70 million to the national bank account (E) in the name of the defendant from the victim.

The Defendant, upon receiving telephone calls from the employees of Bosing from the Defendant’s name misscam and received 20 million won at the heart point of the National Bank in the Blcheon-si in the game of the same day, withdrawn the sum of 70 million won, including: (a) the amount of KRW 15 million at the sub-central point of the National Bank; and (b) the withdrawal of KRW 15 million at the sub-central point of the National Bank; and (c) the amount of KRW 15 million at the sub-central branch of the National Bank; and (d) the amount of KRW 1.4 million among the employees of Boscing, was paid as the fee.

As a result, the defendant, in collusion with the employees in charge of singing the name in collusion, deceiving the victim, and deceiving the victim by receiving a total of KRW 70 million from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. D. D.