A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of seven hundred thousand won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. On March 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 10:40 on March 27, 2017, at the conference room in the Do residents’ sports conference room in the Do residents’ sports conference room in 2017, Do residents’ Do residents’ sports conference and carried out conversations with the victim B (39 years of age) on the part of the victim’s left hand and pushed the victim into a wall; (b) on the part of the victim, the Defendant cut down the part of the victim’s body by cutting down his arms.

At this time, the defendant and the victim's sound listened to and entered the meeting room, and the defendant, with the left hand, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as impairment of the character of the part where it is necessary to provide medical treatment for about 10 days, such as satisfy, gy, and satisfy, on the victim's face.

2. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place described in paragraph 1, inflicted injury on the victim A (39 years of age) such as satisfy, fating the bat, bating the bat and satching the bat, satching the part of the victim with the batd, pushing the victim’s bat, and satching the bat, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Entry of the defendant A's partial statement in the first trial record;

1. The statement made by the witness A (limited to Defendant B) among the second public trial records, and the statement made by the witness F in the third public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police against B (limited to Defendant A);

1. An investigation report (referring to the hearing of statements from wooden persons G);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the allegations by the Defendants and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act in the provisional payment order

1. Defendant A

A. The outline of the assertion did not look at Defendant B’s face.

B. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court: