beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.02.16 2017고단134

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On November 29, 1999, A, an employee of the Defendant, operated B freight in the 11.895 tons below the 2 axis of B freight at a Gunn-Tol, 19.8km point 19.8km away from the west Coastal Highway in Sinung-si.

2. In a case where an agent, employee, or other worker of a juristic person commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable law to this case, as to the business of the juristic person, under Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), the juristic person

“The part” retroactively lost its effect in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision on the constitutionality of a statute of limitations (Supreme Court Order 2010Hun-Ga38 Decided October 28, 2010).

Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.