except that the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 22, 2018, around 02:14, the Defendant received a notice of the payment of the unpaid penalty from C on the ground of non-payment of the taxi pay, at the 200 Dompo-ro, Busan, the Dompo-gu, the Dompo-gu, Busan, and the 3rd parking lot of the Dompo-gu, the Dompo-gu, the Dompo-gu, the Dompo-gu, the Dompo-gu, the Dompo-gu, the Dompo-gu, the Dompo-gu.

C Hashes, “Is the bit of bitch bitch bit of bitch bitch bit of bitch bit of bitch bit of bitch bit of bitch bit of bitch bit of bitch,” and assaulted C her chest on two occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the handling of 112 Reports.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Type 1 (Interference with the performance of public duties and coercion of duties) in the basic area (six months to one year and six months) (a person who has a special sentencing factor) of the sentencing criteria; and

2. The crime of this case committed by the Defendant on the sentence of sentence is a situation unfavorable to the Defendant, where the Defendant took the chest of a police officer called out after receiving a report from a taxi engineer and the police officer on the floor of his hand, and thus obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties, and the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak. In order to establish a state’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant for a crime interfering with the performance of official duties.

However, the defendant acknowledges the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, and the defendant does not repeat the same mistake again.

The circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's past conviction or fine, and the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment in excess of the same criminal record or fine, and other circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.