However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On August 14, 2020, the Defendant damaged the property by leaving the Defendant and D joint-owned market value of timber to E for the reason that he/she did not dispute with D in the buildings C B at Mayang-si around 21:20 on August 14, 2020.

2. On August 14, 2020, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in building C B on August 14, 2020; and (b) was asked by G from G from the circumstances surrounding the G in which the Ganyang Police Station F District was called out after receiving a 112 report, and was asked by G about the circumstances of the instant case; (c) “I am fright and n’t n’t n’t n’t n’t n’t n’t h’s face; and (d) the said G attempted to go out of make.”

As we wish to do so, the G was assaulted, such as fluoring him/her to do so, and fluoring him/her over the upper part of G’s upper part of his/her garment, as he/she was above the string of the G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E and D;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2009