However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On May 21, 2017, the Defendants considered that the Defendants were at the front of the “D” restaurant located in Kimhae-si C around May 21, 2017, and that they were at the front of the Defendant who reported the victim E (44 years old).

Accordingly, Defendant B had the victim's chest and face in drinking, and Defendant A also had the victim's face in drinking. The victim's face can be taken.

The Defendants continued to find out the fact that the damaged person entered a nearby convenience store and came out of the 112 report request, and the victim was towed in the future of the “F” restaurant, and Defendant B could not get the shoulder of the victim in good hand, and Defendant A had the face of the victim by drinking.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put the victim in mind with the number of days of treatment, which is inside the body of the victim.

2. The Defendant, at around 10:45 on the same day as the preceding paragraph, takes out the Defendant’s resident registration certificate in front of the “F” restaurant located in G in Kimhae-si, and in front of the “F” restaurant, as in the preceding paragraph, the police officer assistant H and police officer of the police station in the Kimhae-si, who was called out after receiving a report from E 112, who is requested

In order to tear it, the police officers who control it are threatening to drink it, and take the bath to “I ambling, I ambling,” and “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling.”

For the reasons described in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant continued to arrest a flagrant offender with H’s face one time due to the defect head in order to arrest a flagrant offender, and I got h’s face by saying “I rings, vins, and vins, h’s face” and read I’s body.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 report processing and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to E, H, I, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each damaged photograph;

1. Defendant A of the relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts