beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.03.18 2013고단1692

폭행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 13, 2013, the Defendant of the assault and damage of property: (a) moved one another in the course of driving with the Franchising car driven by the injured party E (the age of 36) while driving the DST5 car at the entrance of the Mapo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si; (b) moved one another in the front of the Franchising car, which the injured party E (the age of 36) is driving; (c) laid down the cell phone and the wall on the victim’s face; and (d) took one time in the front of the franchising car, where the franchis of the franchising car was driven by a mobile phone.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim and damaged the passenger car owned by the victim to be equivalent to KRW 1,512,023 of the repair cost.

2. 모욕 및 공용물건손상 피고인은 전항과 같은 일시, 장소에서, 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 군포경찰서 G지구대 경찰관들이 피고인을 폭행 및 재물손괴 혐의로 현행범인 체포하자, 주민 10여명 등이 듣고 있는 가운데 위 G지구대 경찰관인 피해자 H에게 “야 이 개새끼야 내가 뭘 잘 못했냐, 이 개새끼야 씹새끼야”라고 큰 소리로 욕설하고, 경찰관들이 피고인을 순찰차인 I 아반떼 승용차의 뒷좌석에 태우자 “야 이 개새끼들아 저 새끼들은 안 태우고 왜 나만 태우냐”라고 소리치며 발로 위 순찰차 내부를 수회 걷어차 뒷좌석 유리창이 깨지게 하는 등 수리비 1,053,708원 상당이 들도록 손괴하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant abused the victim openly, and damaged the objects used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of H and E;

1. Vehicle photographs;

1. Application of each written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 31 of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for each sentence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.