2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. After being appointed as a patrol officer on March 21, 1992, the Plaintiff promoted to the police officer on November 11, 2006, and served in the B police station on July 17, 2013, and served in the B police station’s livelihood safety and C District.

B. On September 6, 2013, the General Disciplinary Committee for Police Officers in Seoul Gwanak Police Station decided to dismiss the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 78(1)1 through 3 of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56, 57, and 63 of the State Public Officials Act on the grounds that the Plaintiff violated Article 56 (Duty of Good Faith), 57 (Duty of Custody) and 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity) on the following grounds. The Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the issuance of a dismissal order on September 11, 2013.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff, at the time of his work in the Goak Police Station C District, 11:00 to 13:40, on August 17, 2013, the Plaintiff, at the time of his work in the Goak Police Station C District, mixed with a mixed 1 soldier’s disease and three diseases in his own dwelling in Gyeonggi-gun, and entered at 13:50 (14:23 in the written disciplinary decision; hereinafter the same shall apply) as “14:50, on the ground of clerical error, etc. at panty and 13:50 (the written disciplinary decision was corrected by the appeals review committee; hereinafter the same shall apply). The Plaintiff, while driving his car parked in front of his house at the time of 100 meters (150 meters) through 3.0 meters (in the written disciplinary decision, 100 meters) and then, 300 meters (1.5 meters) of appraisal and 100 meters of neighboring goods will not be sold.