If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On November 22, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s taxi service by interfering with the victim’s taxi service by force by interfering with the victim’s taxi operation for about 20 minutes, including hearing horses that “the taxi is going to board in the order of stopping and going to a waiting taxi in front,” and that “the taxi is going to go to a waiting taxi in the order of stopping,” on the part of the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the above time, at the above time, at the above time, and at the above place, listened to the horses of the police officer F belonging to the Yangsan Police Station E police box called for the foregoing reasons to be taken in front of the waiting taxi, followed by the above cab, and booming the F by taking a bath to the F, and booming the F’s face, and booming the F’s face.

그 후 피고인은 순찰차를 타고 위 E 파출소 주차장에 도달한 후 하차하는 과정에 왼발로 F의 이마 부위를 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on police statements made to C, F, and G;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), the selection of each fine (the confessions and reflects as contingent crimes, the fact that confessions and reflects as contingent crimes, the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine, the degree of damage is minor, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;