If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Defendant

Co-Defendant B, etc., even though the occurrence of a traffic accident did not occur or intentionally caused a traffic accident, they conspired to receive insurance proceeds after receiving the accident from the insurance company as if the accident occurred due to negligence.

At around 21:20 on December 11, 2009, the Defendant, Co-Defendant B, and Co-Defendant C obtained KRW 4,196,010 in total from the above victim for agreement, etc. and acquired KRW 4,196,010 in total from the victim Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. to the victim that the Defendant, Co-Defendant C, and Co-Defendant C sustained injury due to continuous negligence of the vehicle driven by the Defendant and the F vehicle driven by Co-Defendant C, even though there was no traffic accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of interrogation of suspect against co-defendant B;

1. Statement of suspect interrogation against Co-defendant C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on payment of insurance proceeds;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;