However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2020. 1. 19. 19:00경 대구 남구 B 소재 C 가게에서, ‘장사를 안 한다는데 손님이 계속 안 나간다’는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 대구남부경찰서 D파출소 소속 경위 E, 순경 F으로부터 귀가할 것을 요청받자, 위 경찰관들을 향해 “너거가 뭐 잘했노, 이 씨발놈아, 개씨발새끼, 다 찍어라 이 썅놈아, 내가 찍는 걸 겁낼 거 같아, 야 이 씹새꺄, 이 대갈빡이 씨발놈아, 너같은 것들은 나 용서 안 한다, 경찰 너 것들이 뭔데, 너거 경찰이 뭔데, 지랄하고 자빠졌네, 이 씨발 새끼들아, 개새끼들아.”라는 등의 욕설을 하고, 계속하여 오른발로 순경 F의 다리를 1회 차고, 오른팔로 경위 E의 팔을 1회 치고, 피고인 소유의 가방을 순경 F의 몸을 향해 수회 휘두르는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the service log of a police box and the 112 Incident processing statement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In full view of the circumstances following the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and the overall sentencing conditions indicated in the records, the sentence as ordered shall be determined.

D. Unfavorable circumstances: The crime of this case is committed by the defendant under the influence of his leader and assault, etc. to the police in the course of performing his duties, which is not clear that the crime of this case is committed: The defendant is against the defendant, and there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine.