However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 01:15 on October 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) caused disturbance, such as passing along the road in the Geum-gu, Busan, by drinking at the same time, and called, “Isk for a low woman, leaving her seat, and leaving her seat........................” and (b) sought the Defendant’s words “Isk for a woman, how Isk for a woman,?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the fact that the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was found to have lost his dog and found his dog, would have caused the crime of this case by contingency; (b) the degree of violence is not serious; (c) the defendant is against the defendant; (d) the defendant has no criminal records of the same kind; and (e) the defendant has no criminal records of the same kind; and (e) the various conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments