However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:10 on February 17, 2016, the Defendant: (b) was a restaurant with the trade name “E” for the operation of the Victim D (E) in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu; and (c) notwithstanding the absence of intent or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with food from the injured party, the Defendant, who was ordered to pay the price, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount from the injured party, by deceiving the victim by failing to pay the price by taking orders for alcohol and food equivalent to KRW 10,000,000, a total of KRW 10,000,000.

"2016 Highest 365"

1. On January 20, 2016, at around 20:00, the defrauded F was provided with food equivalent to KRW 9,000,00 from the victim who was the victim F (51) located in Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, with food, and the facts were: (a) in a restaurant of “H” operated by the victim F (51) located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul; (b) in fact, the victim had had no intent or ability to pay the cost even if he was provided with food, and had the victim

2. On January 20, 2016, the Defendant, at around 22:00, obtained alcohol equivalent to KRW 126,000 from the injured party, by deceptioning the victim as if he would have had no intent or ability to pay the amount even if he was provided with alcoholic beverages, and by deceiving the victim as if he would have paid the amount of alcoholic beverages, the Defendant acquired the alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 126,00 from the injured party.

On May 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 23:10 on May 12, 2016, and (b) around 23:10, at the Ning shop operated by the victim M in Southern-gu L, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, and (c) was provided by the injured party with alcohol, alcohol, and alcohol, and (d) was paid to the injured party.

However, the fact did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if the victim was provided with the alcohol or speech.

The defendant was provided from the injured party with the service of beer 5 C, to beer 5 C, to beer 1, and to beer 10,000 won.