However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On September 16, 201, the Defendants discovered a f1 ton cargo vehicle parked by the victim E on the front side of the D Company located in Seogu Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and Defendant B reported the network around the surrounding area; Defendant A opened a door that was not a locker for the said cargo vehicle and carried it at the driver’s seat, and driven the said cargo vehicle while driving it.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

2. Defendant A driving a stolen F Poter vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (reports on attachment to the AA driver's license register);

1. Defendant A of pertinent legal provisions relating to criminal facts: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 152 Subparag. 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, Defendant B: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act in cases where the Defendants are juveniles);