When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 23:30 on December 11, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the police officer E (the age of 29) who belongs to the police officer E (the age of 29) of the original police station D Zone D (the age of 29) called “the payment of the drinking value” to “C” at the main point of “C” located in the original police station B, which had been reported 112.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports (the results of confirmation of a scamt to police officers present);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is committed by assaulting a police officer in uniform and obstructing the performance of official duties, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the defendant. However, the defendant is against the recognition of the crime of this case, the defendant has no record of being punished as obstruction of performance of official duties, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by considering comprehensively