However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On March 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was a foreigner of Vietnam’s nationality, without obtaining a driver’s license for a vehicle; (b) was discovered as a violation of road traffic law (unlicensed driving) while driving a Crando XG car on March 12, 2014; and (c) was discovered as a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving); (d) was carried out at the military police station guard on the 16th Donsan-ro 324, Sinposi-si and the D team office as if he/she is the E, who is the Defendant’s seat; and (e) was examined as a police officer under the jurisdiction of the said military police station on the 19:34 of the same day and entered the name “E” without authority in the letter of statement in the suspect interrogation protocol

Accordingly, the defendant has forged E's signature for the purpose of exercising.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, submitted to F police officers belonging to the above Military Police Station, who knew of the forgery of the protocol of suspect interrogation, stating the signature of the forged E at the time and place, and exercised the forged signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect;

1. Application of the official statutes to request verification of fraudulent use by foreigners;

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 239 of the Criminal Act on the crime) and Article 239 (2) and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act on the crime (the point of exercising the above investigation signature);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;