However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a person who is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with E on November 4, 2011.

On July 2013, 2013, the Defendant sent Fudio 201 to B and once, for the first time.

B. On July 2013, 2013, the Defendant sent the Fstudio 201 to B and once with the Defendant.

C. Around September 30, 2013, the Defendant sent a cross-complosive telecom with B and one time from the mutually incompetied telecom in Jinju-si. D.

On October 7, 2013, the Defendant sent to the first sexual intercourse with B from the mutually incompeting telecom in the upper-dong of Jinju-si.

E. On October 14, 2013, the Defendant had a sexual intercourse with B on one occasion at the HMoel located in G in the racing-si.

2. Defendant B knew that he was a spouse of A, the Defendant had sexual intercourse with A, as described in the first to the second paragraph E, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the marriage relation certificate and the Acts and subordinate statutes of the reception certificate;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime: The first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act: the second sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;

The Institute of Jind Co., Ltd.