In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Defendant

D is the English instructor of the E Institute in the English language, and the defendant B is the editor in the Frogate.

1. On April 13, 2008, Defendant D, using a computer located in the former Dondo G Apartment-dong 101, Jeondo-dong 101, thereby impairing the honor of the victim K, who is the principal of the above school, by openly pointing out the false fact that “H high school is the lowest high school across the country, the increase of I level and land difference from I level, and one teacher in charge of autonomous learning supervision,” thereby impairing the honor of the victim K, who is the principal of the above school, and the chairman of the operation committee.

2. Defendant B, on April 25, 2008, posted the above contents on the five pages of the F Newspaper, and distributed them to the readers, and damaged the honor of the above victims by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants (including the part of the J's statement among the two-time protocol against Defendant A)

1. Statement of the police statement to J;

1. A complaint;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the results of combined academic background evaluation to the Internet publishing contents, the results of evaluation by level of the education evaluation of high school 2008, the results of evaluation by national combined academic background in March 2008, the current status of entrance to higher schools, the F10 on April 25, 2008, the F10 on April 25, 2008, the current status of university admission to international high school in year 2008, the certification of contents, and the Acts

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants asserted that the order of provisional payment [the Defendants] under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was not defamation by specifying the J of the principal of the HH high school, and that the contents posted on the Internet homepage and F newspapers are not false, and that the contents posted on the Internet homepage and F newspapers are posted on the Internet homepage and F newspapers for the development of HH high school.

First, the victim JJ, the principal of H High School, is the honorary.