beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.07.04 2013노142

업무상과실치사등

Text

All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that Defendant A deposited KRW 5 million, which is part of the amount of damage for the bereaved family members of the victim G, the above Defendant actively cooperated with the above Defendant so that the said bereaved family members can receive consolation money of KRW 50 million from E, the said bereaved family members received industrial accident insurance money from the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service, and the said Defendant’s confessions of all the facts charged in the instant case and fails to repeat again, it is unfair for the lower court to punish the Defendant (one year of imprisonment with labor, two years of suspended execution, and 160 hours of community service order).

B. Defendant B (1) misunderstanding of facts refers to Defendant B (1) In the case of a caterar cater, the operation of a mobile cater for which three-class cutting operations have been completed, and in the case of a caterar cater, it is much in the form of the cater's driving in accordance with the recreations installed in the ceiling in the factory building. In this case, the body of the cater who is being catered and driven around.

Since the defendant was in charge of cutting off and cutting off the freight truck, it refers to a string string string strings, which 10 cm wide by 10cm wide by string string strings on the string string string strings. It is irrelevant to the above defendant as working parties, such as the victim, etc., and the above defendant did not cut off strings by strings without strings at the time of cutting off, although the above defendant did not follow the order of the strings, and instead, the court below recognized the business negligence of the above defendant, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

(2) Even if the facts charged in the instant case of unfair sentencing are found guilty, the Defendant’s life-related accident is committed on the basis of the crails for more than 30 years.