except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 9, 2014, around 09:25, the Defendant argued the problem of settlement of the victim D and the mechanical cost at the office of the corporation located in the 1st floor, Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Busan. B.

When the Defendant was refused to pay the outstanding amount of KRW 18,00,000 from the victim, the Defendant purchased one copy at an infinite shop near the above office, and entered the said office with a seter and entered the said office, and distributed approximately 7 liters of the time width to the Defendant’s body and the above office floor.

As a result, the defendant prepared fire prevention for the purpose of destroying a building in which people exist.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning shotos and field photographs;

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (All circumstances such as the confession of a criminal act and the reflection thereof, the fact that an agreement has been reached with the victim, and the first fact that is the criminal);