2. The crime of this case is not unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is too large even if it is considered that the defendant's act of crime of this case is recognized and against the defendant, and the defendant reimburses the repair cost of the public goods whose public goods have been damaged, considering the fact that the defendant damaged the victim's vehicle and thereby the defendant was arrested, and that the crime is bad in quality, including the records of punishment for the same crime, and that there are many criminal records including the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, circumstances leading to the crime, circumstances after the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, circumstance leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.