2. With respect to this part of the scope of liability for damages, this court’s reasoning is as follows, with the content of “A.I. lost earnings” and “B. Future Medical Expenses (Public Notification)” in the judgment of the court of first instance, and it is identical to the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding “g. lawsuit” to “the scope of liability for damages.” As such, this court’s reasoning is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The defendant's argument is rejected in light of (1) operation period and number of days of operation: (3) on the 22th day of each month until he reaches 60 years of age, as long as the plaintiff was a major at the time of the accident, the heavy wage at the time of the internal line shall be applied, and the defendant shall not apply the heavy wage at the time of the internal line because the plaintiff was a function-certified internal line assisting the plaintiff's major, but the above report does not have separate items of wages at the time of internal line. However, the defendant's argument is that the internal line's main line of the report at the time of the above report at the time is seen to have been investigated the actual condition of wages including the internal line, and the fact that the internal line at the time of the report at the time of the above report at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at issue: 9: 111% of the original hospital at the court below.