If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 3, 2015, at around 21:34, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with alcohol content of 0.123% in blood without a motor vehicle driver's license, and driven the two-lanes of the two-lanes between the two-lanes between the two-lanes in the direction of the Cheongju-si, the petition of the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-gu, the Cheongju-gu, the Cheongdong Center, the front of the Cheongju-gu, the Cheongnam-gu, the Eup-gu, the Eup-Myeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third public trial date);

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the principal driver's statement report and the driver's license ledger;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) of the relevant Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine (no previous offense shall be committed after he/she has been sentenced to a fine due to reflectivity, or driving under drinking in 204);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as described in paragraph 1 of the facts constituting the crime, was negligent by neglecting his duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by taking into account the front section and left section and left section while driving a motor vehicle in the Gucas, and by neglecting his duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulatinging the steering direction and brakes of the Defendant, thereby leaving the lane to the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant, and was in order of the victim’s petition road, street lamps owned by the Gu office, street trees, and the victim’s Korean electrical power.

Defendant 1 caused damage to each of the above occupational negligence equivalent to KRW 4,477,00 of the street lamps owned by the Gu office for petition of the victim, the repair cost of street trees, and KRW 40,930,486 of the CC Forum owned by the Korean Electric Power Corporation.

2. This part of the facts charged is an offense falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and an indictment may be instituted against the victim’s express will in accordance with the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.