An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

"2014 Highest 1391"

1. On September 24, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s “F” coffee shop in the victim E’s “F,” which was located in the Namnam-gun, Namnam-nam-gun on September 24, 2010, stating that the Defendant would have a debt owed to the third party that performed the previous work, and if 9.5 million won is paid in advance, the Defendant would have a debt repaid with the said money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to flee by receiving money from the victim E, and became a bad credit holder due to the unpaid debt of the Handphone fee of a million won, and the Defendant was also under circumstances, such as the prepaid charge of KRW 10 million received from GC, and there was no intent and ability to return the money even if the Defendant received the aforementioned prepaid payment from the said victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant, from October 6, 2010 to October 6, 2010, will work in the above coffee shop from the victim E, and the same year as a prepaid payment.

9. Around 25, 250,000 won in cash, 8.5 million won in cash with an account of community credit cooperatives under H around the 29th of the same month, and 5.5 million won in cash around October of the same year.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the above victim.

2. On December 16, 2010, the Defendant committed a crime on December 16, 2010, within the mutual and aesthetic restaurant located in the Namyang-si, Nam-si, and under the trade name of “J” in the Enju City, the Defendant made a false statement to the husband of the victim K, who operates an entertainment tavern under the trade name of “J” in the Enju City, “on the pretext of a prior payment, five million won or more” to “J” operated by the said victim.

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to flee by receiving money from the Victim K, and became a bad credit holder due to the unpaid debt of the Handphone fee of a million won, and in addition, the Defendant was also liable for the prepaid fee of KRW 10 million received from GC, and the prepaid payment of KRW 9.5 million received from the said E has already been abandoned. As such, the aforementioned prepaid payment from the said victim is a situation.