beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.12.14 2018나70592

약정금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

In light of the evidence submitted by the court of first instance, the defendant's assertion in the court of first instance is not significantly different from the defendant's argument in the court of first instance, and in light of the evidence submitted by the court of first instance (the plaintiff and the defendant did not submit new evidence in this

The reasoning of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part written by the defendant in February below, and therefore, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The part written by the court of first instance was “at least 20 pages of the fourth 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance,” followed: “The e-mail attached to the letter of payment by the defendant to the plaintiff's female-friendly G shall be fright or best to see whether the e-mail accompanied by the letter of payment by the defendant will be "at least fe-mail will have been cut, and if e-mail was requested to be notarized on May 23 or 24."

The first to 21 5 pages 4 to 1 5 pages "It is reasonable to deem that an agreement has been reached between the plaintiff and the defendant as stated in the above payment note" has been adopted to read "it is reasonable to deem that the defendant reached an agreement with the plaintiff on the contents stated in the above payment note at the time of delivery of the above payment note."

Article 14 to 18 of the 5th 16th “B” is added as follows: “The Plaintiff forced the Defendant to make a payment to the extent of intimidation beyond “an act of demanding payment within the extent normally acceptable to the obligor by the obligee”.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.