beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2020.06.02 2019고단2677

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A game products related business entity shall not allow others to gamble or perform other speculative acts using game products, or leave them to do so, and no one shall exchange or arrange for exchange or repurchase the results of tangible or intangible results acquired through the use of game products, or engage in business of repurchase, and no one shall provide the game products for the distribution or use, or display or store them for such purposes, the contents of which are different from those of the game products management committee.

1. The Defendants’ joint criminal conduct is the owner of a “E” game room in Daegu-gu and the second floor registered as a juvenile game providing establishment at the Daegu-gu Office. Defendant B is the head of the above game room management department, and Defendant C is the employee of the game room.

The Defendants set up a game product different from the contents of the rating by the Game Management Committee in the above game room, exchanged the scores of the game product to customers, thereby soliciting customers to perform speculative acts.

From April 20, 2018 to May 12:20, 2019, the Defendants: (a) operated the said E’s game site from around April 20, 2018 to May 17, 2019; (b) established and operated the 35th unit of the “informto Storm” and 35th unit of the game product as classified by the Game Management Committee; and (c) added separate points to the game machine inside the game machine, different from the contents of the rating, for the Acuash game machine, on the part of the left-hand side of the game machine, the Defendants exchanged the points of the game product acquired as a result of the cuash game machine and the “informorm” game machine in cash, with the exception of 10% of the fee.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to do gambling and other speculative acts using game products, and through the use of game products.