beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.09.28 2018고단452

특수상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On April 28, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for the crime of assault at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on August 26, 2017.

[2] On February 7, 2018, the Defendant, around 09:30 on February 7, 2018, performed drinking together with D and E (59 years of age) at the residence of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul. Around February 7, 2018, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the part of the victim’s head with small-scale disease, which is a dangerous object located on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim fells the Defendant, and caused the victim’s head injury, where it is impossible to know the number of days of treatment, the victim’s head volume was 8cm.

On January 12, 2018, the Defendant reported that he/she drinks with the Victim I(61) in a restaurant with the trade name of "H operated by G in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 12, 2018," and that he/she drinks with the Victim I(61) on the part of the Victim.

” 고 하면서 아무런 이유 없이 시비를 걸어 피해자의 멱살을 잡고 식당 밖으로 끌고 나가 오른손으로 피해자의 왼뺨을 2회 때려 폭행하였다.

"2018 Highest 2644"

1. Around August 12, 2018, the Defendant obscenity 09:40, and around August 12, 2018, her obscenity her obscenity her brymous act was her sexual organ and her sexual organ was her brymous in the G Park of Gangdong-gu Seoul and reported by K, L, etc.

2. On August 12, 2018, the Defendant, at the same place as No. 10:00 around August 12, 2018, expressed that “The Defendant, who was demanded to present an identification card from the slope N belonging to the Mountainous District, dispatched after receiving a report 112, sent the above N at one time among the figures of the said N, with the desire to “I ch feasc feasia,” and the Defendant, who was in receipt of a demand for presentation of an identification card.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (Binding text of judgment and summary order), text of judgment, and current status of acceptance by each individual";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police of E.