beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.05.11 2017고단448

권리행사방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 24, 2011, the Defendant agreed to purchase construction machinery more than C in a non-displace C, and agreed to pay KRW 45,000 per month between 36 months and 1,250,000 per month by concluding an automobile installment contract from the victim's modern social money company. A mortgage was created on the construction machinery above in the name of the said modern social company around September 9, 201.

After that, on July 10, 2012, the Defendant delayed payment, received a demand for the repayment of installments from the above Hyundai Social Co., Ltd., and disposed of the above construction machinery on July 10, 2012.

Accordingly, the defendant concealed his own property, which is the object of the victim's right, and obstructed the victim's exercise of right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the complaint, peremptory notice to exercise of right to collateral security on automobiles, confirmation of application for loans to purchase automobiles, and construction machinery register;

1. 범죄사실에 대한 해당 법조 형법 제 323 조( 징역 형 선택) [ 양형이 유] 양형기준 : 징역 8월 이하 ☞ 권리행사 방해 감경영역( 미필적 고의) 연 체 금액이 3,500만 원 상당 남은 상태에서 이 사건 범행을 저질러 현재까지 도 담보목적 물의 소재가 파악되지 아니한 상황인 점이나 피해 규모, 피해 미회복 등의 여러 사정을 종합할 때 그 죄책에 상응한 처벌이 불가피하나, 동종 범행으로 처벌 받은 전력은 없고 집행유예 이상 전과도 없는 점이나 고의의 정도, 반성태도 등 기록과 변론에 나타난 여러 정상을 아울러 참작하여 주문과 같이 형을 정함

참조조문