However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 28, 2017, the Defendant collected the clothes installed by the victim D in front of the 101 unit of the Gangnam-si apartment 101 Dong, Gangnam-si 201 on April 28, 2017, and collected the clothing in front of the 10th female clothes, 7th female clothes, 1st female clothes, 1st female clothes, and 17th female clothes installed by the victim F in the Gangnam-si apartment in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, and brought about two female clothing and 2nd female clothing. From June 2014 to April 28, 2017, the Defendant collected the clothing of each victims over 349 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and had taken 513,000 won in total, and had been more than 1,655 g of the market value, and had been more than 1,655 g of women, more than 15g women, and more than 15g women.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to J, F, H and D;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A report on investigation (verification of place where the criminal suspect committed the crime), a report on investigation (verification of the suspect's residence), and a report on investigation (related to measurement of weight, such as clothes, etc. seized in an apartment

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed in a planned and organized manner;

1. Relevant Article 332 of the Criminal Act and Articles 332 and 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although there are many times of crimes with reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the accused is against the wrongness of the accused, the victims do not want the punishment of the accused, and the primary offender, etc.