2. The fact that the Defendant appears to have committed all of the instant crimes, and that there is room to view that there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the previous fines, that the Defendant’s assistance was partially contributed to the victim’s winning in the relevant civil procedure, and that the Defendant is an aged person, etc. are favorable to the Defendant.

However, in the process of helping the victim living together with him for about six years, the crime of this case was embezzled by using 8,021,40 won or more in the course of entering and withdrawing money in the name of the defendant, which he received from the victim in excess of 68,70,000 won for actual expenses as attorney's expenses, and acquired the money in excess of 68,70,000 won for the victim's expense, and the victim acquired the money in favor of civil lawsuit to the securities account in the name of the defendant and embezzled it for the victim, and the crime is not good in terms of motive, circumstance, method and result of the crime, economic damage the victim living together with the defendant does not exceed the amount of fraud and embezzlement of this case, and it seems that the economic damage that the victim was living together with the defendant exceeds the amount of fraud of this case and embezzlement of this case. In addition, in light of the circumstances where the victim submitted the documents requesting the severe punishment of the defendant continuously in the court below and the court below, the defendant appears to have suffered a fine of 200,00 won or more favorable punishment.