When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 25, 2014, the Defendant refused to request the F to change the list of the members present at the meeting of the clan D located in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Da, with the names, addresses, etc. of the members present at the above meeting from E and the name, address, etc. of the members present at the meeting from E, and damaged the list of the members present at the above clan by both descendants.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The recording of each of the statements made by witnesses F and G in the second public trial records;

1. Each police statement made in relation to F, E, and G;

1. Recording notes (16 pages for investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on evidence submitted to the F;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and Article 366 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant’s signature shall not be in the same form as the signature of less than 38 pages of investigation records, but in the denial of signature of the evidence No. 1 of the above evidence, the evidence No. 1 of the above evidence has not been completed and is merely a supporting material for the meal cost disbursed after Congress, and is not the object of the crime of property damage.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, the defendant does not submit evidence No. 1, which the defendant had been in custody at the investigation stage, and submitted to this court. The defendant was investigated by the police. ② The defendant was investigated by the police and submitted the list of the participants.

He was kept, but he was unable to tear the tear while cleaning his baby.

Therefore, the list of the participants who had been brought by the current system has been created equally by extracting the files in the computer as they are.

In making the statement "," and submitting a list of 28 pages or less of the investigation records, the evidence No. 1 and the above list shall be the same.