The plaintiff and the defendant are members of the clan.

피고는 “2011. 6. 12. 14:00경 전북 고창군 D에 있는 ‘E’ 식당에서, C파 종중원들과 함께 식사하면서 서원강당 전기공사와 관련된 대화를 하던 중 원고로부터 욕설과 함께 ‘도둑놈, 니가 뭘 아느냐’는 말을 듣고 이에 화가 나, 그곳 식탁 위에 있던 위험한 물건인 소주병을 원고의 머리에 던져 원고에게 약 2주간의 치료를 요하는 두피의 열린 상처 등의 상해를 가하였다.”라는 범죄사실(이하 ‘이 사건 불법행위’라 한다)에 관하여 서울중앙지방법원 2016고단4042호로 기소되어 2016. 9. 7. 징역 1년에 집행유예 2년을 선고받았다.

The defendant appealed against the above judgment as Seoul Central District Court 2016No3704, but was sentenced to a judgment dismissing the appeal, and the defendant appealed, but the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on March 15, 2017.

(2016Do21335). [Reason 2016Do21335] (Grounds for recognition] did not dispute, each of the statements in Gap 1, 7, and 8 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings, the purport of the plaintiff's argument as to the purport of the whole pleadings, is that the plaintiff suffered injury to the two open upper parts due to the defendant's tort in this case, and that the plaintiff suffered injury to the two upper parts, etc. due to the defendant's tort in this case, and that the plaintiff suffered injury to the plaintiff due to the

The Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the payment of KRW 40,00,000, which is a part of the amount of KRW 2,358,740, which is a part of the amount of KRW 5,000,000, which is a part of the amount of damages for delay, and KRW 15,00,000, which is a part of the amount of damages for delay.

According to the facts of recognition as above, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the tort of this case.

According to the statement of evidence No. 9, the scope of the liability for damages, the plaintiff suffered from the tort of this case.