(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Public housing project (C district): The defendant; D public notice by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 26, 2010 - Project operator:

(b) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation by March 26, 2015 - The land to be expropriated: [Attachment Table] owned by the Plaintiffs: Each land indicated in the column for “object of Expropriation” (hereinafter “Seoul Guro-gu E-dong”) (hereinafter “E-dong”) shall be construed as “E-dong,” and each land shall be specified only by the lot number, and each land shall be combined with “each land of this case”): The amount corresponding to the column for the amount of compensation for expropriation: The date of commencement of expropriation: The appraisal corporation of May 19, 2015 - the appraisal corporation of the country, the public appraisal corporation of Korea, the public appraisal corporation of Japan

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of objection on December 17, 2015 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant ruling”) - The Defendant raised an objection on the ground that the amount of compensation for losses as prescribed by the ruling of expropriation was excessive, but dismissed, and the Plaintiffs’ objection to increase the compensation for losses as prescribed by the ruling of expropriation was accepted, and the compensation for losses for each of the instant lands was partially increased, and the increased compensation for losses is as stated in the attached Table [Attachment] stating the amount of compensation for losses.

- An appraisal corporation: Each description of one appraisal corporation and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter referred to as "appraisalr" with an appraisal corporation, and the result of the appraisal along with the result of the appraisal of expropriation with the result of the appraisal of expropriation / [based on recognition] / The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (which include each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) The plaintiffs' assertion that the appraisal of the plaintiffs' assertion is too low, and the defendant should pay the difference between the plaintiffs' reasonable compensation amount. 2) The defendant's assertion that the plaintiffs' appraisal of the plaintiffs' assertion is too low.