However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 19, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court, and on March 14, 201, issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court. < Amended by Act No. 1054, Mar. 14, 2011>

On November 6, 2019, at around 21:00, the Defendant driven a DNA-type car under the influence of alcohol by 0.164% in a section of approximately 1.4m of blood alcohol level from around the same 21.4m to the charge station of the same Gu-based ccafeteria in Ulsan-gu B.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (same-class power);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that there is a record of being sentenced to three times a fine due to the driving under the influence of alcohol for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the fact that there is a high drinking value, the fact that there is a family member to provide support, such as young children, etc. who are living in the workplace and have committed a crime, the fact that the crime is seriously divided and the drinking driving is practicing, the background of drinking