When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-Wood vehicle.

On February 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on February 16, 2015, and led to the intersection from the sloping to the parallel of the sloping registry office located in Pyeongtaek-si.

At the same time, since the signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by operating it as ordered by the signal of the front.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the collision of the front part of the victim C(55 years old) driving on the right side of the Plaintiff’s D taxi due to the negligence of entering the intersection, such as yellow signal, etc.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the victim C, such as catum salt in need of treatment for about two weeks, the injury to the victim E (the 32-year-old passenger), and the injury to the pertinent taxi passenger F (the 32-year-old passenger) in need of treatment for about two weeks, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of each written diagnosis (C, E, F) statute;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;