Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment and the reasoning of the first instance judgment maintained by the lower court in light of the records, it is justifiable to maintain the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding the obstruction of business among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the appeal did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

On the other hand, although the prosecutor appealed to the entire judgment of the court below, the prosecutor did not state specific reasons in the petition of appeal as to the conviction and did not state the reasons for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.