, however, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

[Criminal Records] On September 21, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won as a crime of violating Road Traffic Act in the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court on September 21, 2009.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 26, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.103% of alcohol during blood transfusion around 00:10 on November 26, 2020, the Defendant driven a G low-speed car, a F-owned 4.4km from the Do front of the “C Branch” located in the Chungcheong Budget Zone B to the E intersection located in D.

2. The Defendant, at around 00:40 on November 26, 2020, demanded a measurement on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant was in receipt of a report from 112 that “the sole accident of the vehicle, whether or not the driver is able to confirm how much,” and (b) the Defendant was in the Esection located in Chungcheongnam-gun budget-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the circumstances leading up to the position of the H district unit of the Chungcheongnam-nam Police Station, I, the slope J, K, and L Team, and the situation leading up to the occurrence of the accident, and the Defendant, the driver of the accident, while driving the vehicle while carrying out a field inspection; and (b) the Defendant demanded a measurement on the reason that there is a considerable reason for the Defendant, who was the driver of the accident, to drive the vehicle while driving the vehicle.” (c) whether

“Ching the right shoulder of the slope N one time on the left hand, which prepared a report, etc. on the detection of the driver in the driving of the drinking and the result of the measurement of the driving of the drinking, the face of the slope J, which has been prevented, was taken once on the left hand.

The defendant continued to be arrested by police officers due to the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties, spits 3-4 times in the course of the arrest of the police officers, spits 3-4 times in the course of the arrest of the police officers, and spits 3-4 times in the course of the arrest of the police officers.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the above N, J and I's 112 reports and traffic accidents.

3. The Defendant who damaged public goods was arrested at the time and place specified in paragraph (2) above as a current offender who interfered with the performance of official duties, and the police officers attempted to board the Defendant on the police patrol team, resisting the resistance of the police patrol team and the back of the chief and the back of the police patrol team, which was cut off and later.